Embodiment in Metaphor and Imagery | مجلة قضايا لغوية | Linguistic Issues Journal

##theme.Theme.article.main##

Zafar Abbas
This article investigates the construction of poetic meaning through two competing theoretical frameworks: the classical Aristotelian concept of mimesis (imitation) and the contemporary theory of cognitive mimesis. By contrasting these paradigms, we reveal fundamental divergences in their mechanisms of meaning-making. Our analysis begins with concrete examples embodied metaphor and imaginative projection—to demonstrate how each theory interprets poetic language. We then trace the historical development of meaning in poetic theory, from Aristotle’s emphasis on repressentation to modern cognitive approaches that prioritize embodied experience. This progression highlights how poetic meaning has evolved into an interdisciplinary nexus, bridging literary criticism, rhetoric, poetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Cognitive poetics, in particular, reframes poetic imagery through models of induction, generalization, and implicature (implied meaning). These models treat the image not as a static symbol but as a dynamic construct shaped by the reader’s imagination and perceptual grounding. Central to this approach is the principle of embodiment, which ties linguistic meaning to sensory-motor experiences and challenges traditional binaries between figurative and literal language. By examining how images emerge from and interact with everyday speech, cognitive poetics reveals the deep cognitive underpinnings of poetic effect.
Keywords: Embodiment ; Imagery ; Mimesis ; Cognitive poetics ; Cognitive neuroscience ; Comparative analysis.
1. Akbar Abi Tammam. (1937). Akhbar Abi Tammam (1st ed.).
2. Aristotle. (1983). Poetics (I. Hamada, Trans.). Anglo-Egyptian Library.
3. Aristotle. (1983). Rhetoric (A. Badawi, Trans.). Ministry of Information.
4. Aristotle. (1983). The Art of Poetry (I. Hamada, Trans.). Anglo-Egyptian Library.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577– 609.
6. Bennett, J. (2015). Cognitive neuroscience and literary theory. Routledge.
7. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. Basic Books.
8. Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.
9. Johnson, M., & Lakoff, G. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
10. Johnson, M., & Lakoff, G. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
11. Keenan, E. (2003). Metaphor and the experience of metaphor in cognitive poetics. Journal of Cognitive Science, 29(3), 37–55.
12. Lakoff, G. (1998). Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology and meaning. Cambridge University Press.
13. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
14. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
15. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
16. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
17. Mandler, J. M. (2004). The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. Oxford University Press.
18. Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
19. Starr, G. G. (2013). Feeling beauty: The neuroscience of aesthetic experience. MIT Press.
20. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
21. Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge.
22. Tsur, R. (2012). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Academic Press.
23. Underwood, T. (2019). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. University of Chicago Press.



This content is Open Access

ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of the Editorial team of the Journal of Qaḍāyā luġawiyaẗ (Linguistic Issues)

The Authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published

Authors warrant that the rights of third parties will not be violated and that the publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation

 

 

Copyright © linguistic issues 2020-2026

Center for Scientific and Technical Research for the Development of the Arabic Language

Linguistic Research Unit and Arabic Language Issues in Algeria

National Road 49 Ghardaia Road, PO Box 07 Kasdi Merbah University; Postal Code 30063 Ouargla - Algeria

Tel/Fax:+21329719361     Mail:contact@qadaya-lugawiyat.dz      Website:https://www.qadaya-lugawiyat.dz