Presupposition and it’s relation to Entailment, Conversational Implicature and Iqtidā | مجلة قضايا لغوية | Linguistic Issues Journal

##theme.Theme.article.main##

IBRAHIM ABDULLAH SULAIMAN
This study focuses on presupposition, a linguistic phenomenon that holds utmost importance in
communication. In addition, it analyses three other linguistic phenomena that are closely related to
presupposition:entailment, conversational implicature, and iqtidā. The study discusses presupposition,
clarifying its concept, types, and triggers. It also briefly traces its historical background and highlights its
characteristics or properties with illustrative examples. In addition, it discusses each of the other three
linguistic phenomena, clarifying their concepts, types, and characteristics or properties. It provides
illustrative examples for each phenomenon, to understand their relation to presupposition.Finally, the study
concludes with a summary highlighting this works significant points or results.
Keywords:Presupposition, entailment, conversational implicature, iqtidā, semantic presupposition, pragmatic
presupposition, generalized conversational implicature, particularized conversational implicature, iqtidā
based on legal (sharia) validity, iqtidā based on logical validity, iqtidā based on the speakers truthfulness.
Keywords: Presupposition, entailment, conversational implicature, iqtidā, semantic presupposition,
1. Abdulhakeem, Saif.& Mubarak, Ahmed. (2019). The Humor of Still Standing Contradictions between Implicature and Presuppositions. Studies of Human and Social Sciences, 46, 785-796.
2. Ali, MohamedYunis. (2000). MedievalIslamicPragmatics:Sunni Legal TheoristModels of Textual Communication. Routledge -Taylor and Francis Group, London.
3. Frege, Gottlob. (1960). On Sense and Reference. In Geach, Peter & Black, Max (eds.), Translations from the PhilosophicalWritings of Frege (2nded.). (56-78). Blackwell, Oxford.
4. Gazdar, Gerald. (1979). Pragmatics, Implicature, Presupposition and LogicalForm. Academic Press, New York.
5. Grice, Paul. (1981). Presupposition and Conversational Implicature. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. (183-198). Academic Press, New York.
6. Grice, Paul. (1989). Studies in the Way of Word. Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridge-Massachusetts.
7. Grundy, Peter. (2008). DoingPragmatics (3rded). Hodder Education, London.
8. Huang, Yan. (2014). Pragmatics (2nded). Oxford UniversityPress, London.
9. Karttunen, Lauri. (1973). Presuppositions of Compound Sentences. LinguisticsInquiry, 4 (2), 169-193.
10. Keenan, Edward. (1971). TwoKinds of Presupposition in Natural Language. In Fillmore, Charles &Langendoen, David (eds.), Studies in LinguisticsSemantics. (45-54). Halt, New York.
11. Kempson, R. Margaret. (2017). Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. ProQuest, Michigan.
12. Langendoen, D. Terence. & Savin, Harris. (1971). The Projection Problem for Presuppositions. In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langėndoen (eds.), Studies in LinguisticSemantics. (54-60). New York, Irvington.
13. Leech, Geoffrey. (1981). Semantics: The Study of Meaning (2nd ed). Pelican Books, Middlesex-London.
14. Levinson, Stephen C. (1983).Pragmatics. Cambridge University, New York.
15. Lewis, David. (1979). Scorekeeping in a languagegame. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339-359.
16. Makroom, Reeham. (2018). Presupposition. Journalof Faculty of Arts, 11, 61-82.
17. Oktoma, Erwin. &Mardiyano, Styfanus. (2013). The Analysis of Presupposition in The Short Stories of Sylvester GoridusSkur (English Review). Journal of English Education, 2 (1), 73-83.
18. Paltridge, Brian. (2012). DiscourseAnalysis (2nded). Bloomsbury, London.
19. Russell, Bertrand. (1905). On Denoting. Oxford Journals, 14 (56), 479-493.
20. Stalnaker, Robert. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447-457.
21. Stalnaker, Robert. (2003). Context and Content:Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.
22. Strawson, Frederick. (1950). On Referring. Mind, 59 (235), 320-344.
23. Strawson, Frederick. (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen, London.
24. Thoyyibah, Luthfiyatun. (2017). PresuppositionTriggers: A comparative analysisbetween Oral news and written online news discourse. Journal of AppliedLinguistics and Literacy, 1 (2), 10-23.
25. Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.



This content is Open Access

ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of the Editorial team of the Journal of Qaḍāyā luġawiyaẗ (Linguistic Issues)

The Authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published

Authors warrant that the rights of third parties will not be violated and that the publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation

 

 

Copyright © linguistic issues 2020-2026

Center for Scientific and Technical Research for the Development of the Arabic Language

Linguistic Research Unit and Arabic Language Issues in Algeria

National Road 49 Ghardaia Road, PO Box 07 Kasdi Merbah University; Postal Code 30063 Ouargla - Algeria

Tel/Fax:+21329719361     Mail:contact@qadaya-lugawiyat.dz      Website:https://www.qadaya-lugawiyat.dz